<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Energy Business - India Energy News, Nuclear Energy News, Renewable Energy News, Oil &#38; Gas Sector News, Power Sector News &#187; Special Reports</title>
	<atom:link href="http://energybusiness.in/category/features/special-reports/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://energybusiness.in</link>
	<description>Connect &#62; Decode &#62; Energise</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 03:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Ministry to finalise policy on isolated coal patches by December</title>
		<link>http://energybusiness.in/ministry-finalise-policy-isolated-coal-patches-december/</link>
		<comments>http://energybusiness.in/ministry-finalise-policy-isolated-coal-patches-december/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 08:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gayatrir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebexclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal ministry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal shortage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isolated coal patches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sriprakash Jaiswal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energybusiness.in/?p=4613</guid>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_4614" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://img.energybusiness.in/Shri-Prakash-Jaiswal-3.jpg"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-4614" style="margin: 10px 15px;" title="Shri Prakash Jaiswal 3" src="http://img.energybusiness.in/Shri-Prakash-Jaiswal-3-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Sriprakash Jaiswal, minister of state for coal </p></div>
<p>The coal ministry is expected to finalize rules and regulations for allotment of isolated coal patches by December 2010, to boost coal production in the short term. The coal ministry has identified 20 isolated patches across the country, each of which is estimated to have reserves of about 10 million tonnes.<br />
According to ministry officials, isolated coal patches, unlike coal blocks, have remained unexplored because of the small, uneconomic size of reserves, making them unviable for development by large user industries. However, against the backdrop of a rising demand-supply gap of coal in the country, the ministry has taken the view that these patches of coal reserves could be allotted for use by local industries that fall in the small- and medium-scale operators.<br />
“We will soon make a decision on development of isolated coal patches to increase production that will be beneficial to local industries in the vicinity of the coal patch,” said coal minister Sriprakash Jaiswal. “We will have to decide the basis of allotment. In my view, auction is the only equitable basis for allotment of the coal patches to user industries, and we will frame rules accordingly, which will then be implemented by governments of the states under which the coal patches fall.”<br />
Jaiswal also said that the ministry will soon float global tenders for the development of abandoned mines across the country. Unlike isolated coal patches under the authority of the state governments, abandoned mines fall within the purview of the central government. The ministry of coal has identified 27 abandoned mines estimated to have reserves of 500 million tonnes, and has proposed reviving and developing these through joint ventures with global investors.<br />
Isolated coal patches are under the purview of the Coal Mines Nationalization Act, 1973, under which the authority to allot such reserves falls to the state governments and that coal extracted from such patches cannot be transported by rail and can be utilized only by local industries in the vicinity. Isolated coal patches also have been left out of the purview of the National Mineral (Development and Regulation) Bill 2010, which will be passed into a law in the next session of Parliament, starting in November. Under this proposed law, coal blocks will be put up for auction for captive users, scrapping the present system of allotment. Ministry officials said that since coal patches did not fall within the purview of the new law, separate rules and regulations will have to be framed for the auctioning of these patches.<br />
The coal ministry&#8217;s decisions on coal patches and abandoned mines are aimed at bridging the demand-supply gap in the short term. Total production of coal this fiscal year will be 572.73 million tons, against the current demand of 654 million tons, leaving a shortfall of 82 million tons. According to the coal minister, application for coal supplies for 100,000 MW is pending with the power ministry. India is facing an acute shortage, and no coal is available for the 28,000-MW power generating capacity for which linkages were granted until November 2008.<br />
Given such an acute shortage scenario, the coal ministry has issued notices to 93 companies threatening cancellation of coal blocks allotted to them for failure to develop them within a specific time frame. &#8220;We will not tolerate lessees of coal blocks to idle on their allotted blocks,&#8221; Jaiswal said. &#8220;We cannot allow the situation to continue. If lessees cannot develop the blocks, we shall cancel their allotment and put them up for auction, so that coal production can be boosted within a reasonable time.&#8221; &#8211; <em>EB Bureau </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energybusiness.in/ministry-finalise-policy-isolated-coal-patches-december/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A guide to Renewable Energy Certificate mechanism</title>
		<link>http://energybusiness.in/4407/</link>
		<comments>http://energybusiness.in/4407/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 06:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gayatrir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pxil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REC mechanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable energy certificate trading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energybusiness.in/?p=4407</guid>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://img.energybusiness.in/solar-panels-1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4408" style="margin: 10px 15px;" src="http://img.energybusiness.in/solar-panels-1-110x150.jpg" alt="" width="110" height="150" /></a>India started its Renewable Energy programme in 1981 with the establishment of the Commission for Additional Sources of Energy which was later converted into Ministry of Non-conventional Energy sources in 1992. In 2006, it was renamed ministry of new and renewable energy (MNRE).</p>
<p>The aim of MNRE, the nodal ministry for new and renewable energy is to develop and deploy new and renewable energy supplementing the energy requirements. It is also responsible for formulating policies, implementation, development and intensifying R&amp;D in the sector.</p>
<p><strong>What are the drivers for the REC mechanism in India?</strong></p>
<p>Though blessed with huge potential for renewable energy, all states in India are not equally gifted. While some states have very high potential, some states have very little potential. The unit cost of RE based non-firm power is higher than conventional power sources. Hence, the RE abundant states have no motivation to produce RE based power more than is required to satisfy the RPO mandate.</p>
<p><strong>What is RPO and why would an entity purchase REC?</strong></p>
<p>RPO is Renewable Purchase Obligation and is defined by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) as:</p>
<p>“Renewable Purchase Obligation means the requirement specified by the State Commissions under clause (e) of sub-section (1) of section 86 of the Act, for the obligated entity to purchase electricity from renewable energy sources.”</p>
<p>RPO is specified by the state commissions in terms of percentage of total annual electricity consumed by obligated entities. Being a mandate from the state commissions, obligated entities would be required to either purchase electricity generated from renewable energy sources or purchase RECs in lieu.</p>
<p><strong>What is an REC and why do we require REC?</strong></p>
<p>A renewable energy certificate (REC) is a market-based instrument which provides evidence that a generator has produced a certain amount of electricity from a RE resource.</p>
<p>Electricity produced from renewable energy sources are notionally distinguished into two parts: The first being the electricity component and the second being the environmental attribute of the electricity produced from renewable energy. An REC signifies the second component.</p>
<p>RECs can be traded in the market to meet renewable purchase obligation (RPO).</p>
<p>REC is required in India because:</p>
<p>Distribution of RE resources is not uniform across the country, which results in non uniform RPO.</p>
<p>States with higher RE potential pay more for RE electricity since RE generation is more capital intensive.</p>
<p>RE electricity generation costs are not uniform across the RE technologies.</p>
<p>DISCOMs are reluctant to purchase RE electricity by paying extra.</p>
<p><strong>What are the legal and policy framework for renewable energy in India?</strong></p>
<p>Acts and Regulations which have boosted renewable energy in India are:</p>
<p><strong><em>Electricity Act 2003 (EA 2003) </em></strong></p>
<p>Section 86 of the EA 2003 promotes Renewable Energy by ensuring grid connectivity and sale of renewable electricity. Also creates a demand for renewable energy by requiring SERCs to specify RPOs for the distribution utilities in the State.</p>
<p><strong><em>National Electricity Policy (NEP)</em></strong></p>
<p>Section 5.2.20 promotes private participation in renewable energy. Section 5.12.1 targets the reduction in capital costs of renewable energy technologies through competition. Section 5.12.2 states SERCs should specify appropriate tariffs to promote Renewable Energy. Also specifies percentages that progressively increase the share of electricity generated from renewable sources. Section 5.12.3 promotes the benefits of cogeneration.</p>
<p><strong><em>National Tariff Policy </em></strong></p>
<p>Section 6.4 requires all SERCs to specify minimum percentages for electricity to be purchased from renewable energy sources by April 1, 2006.</p>
<p><strong><em>National Action Plan for Climate Change</em></strong></p>
<p>NAPCC has set the target of 5 per cent renewable energy purchase for FY 2009-10 envisaging that such target would increase by 1 per cent for the next 10 years, i.e., to constitute about 15 per cent  of the energy mix of India by 2015. One policy instrument prescribed in NAPCC is Renewable Energy Certificate (REC) mechanism which would enable large number of stakeholders to purchase renewable energy in a cost effective manner.</p>
<p><strong><em>CERC (Terms for Issuance and Recognition of Renewable Energy Certificate for Renewable Energy Generation) Regulations, 2010</em></strong></p>
<p>CERC’s regulation has been the latest and most important regulation which has set the tone for REC trading in India.</p>
<p><strong>What are the salient features of the CERC (REC) Regulations, 2010?</strong></p>
<p>REC is not an incentive scheme; it enables sale and purchase of renewable component and would co-exist with other incentive based schemes in the country.</p>
<p>The salient features of CERC (REC) Regulations, 2010 are:</p>
<p>Two types of entities are defined in regulations:</p>
<p>Eligible Entities (EE) – Generators who can only sell RECs</p>
<p>Obligated Entities (OE) – Entities having RPO from SERC who can only buy</p>
<p>NLDC is the central agency responsible for registration, issuance, redemption, settlement, and repository. It would be supported by state level agencies</p>
<p> Mw/h of Electricity injected would be eligible for 1 REC</p>
<p>Eligible Entity will undergo an accreditation process with the state agency and a registration process with central agency.</p>
<p>REC would be traded only once &#8211; through a power exchange.</p>
<p>Generators already in long term PPAs or selling electricity to utilities above the “pooled cost of power” would not be eligible for RECs.</p>
<p>Renewable energy source would be declared by MNRE.</p>
<p>Although REC represents the environment attribute, it is not related to carbon credits, which is independent of the REC mechanism.</p>
<p><strong>Are there any categories of certificates that can be traded?</strong></p>
<p>There shall be two categories of certificates, viz., solar certificates based on solar power; and non-solar certificates based on renewable energy sources other than solar.</p>
<p><strong>Can any generator producing electricity from renewable energy sources participate in REC?</strong></p>
<p>Only those renewable energy based generators complying with the following conditions would be eligible to participate in the REC mechanism:</p>
<p>It has obtained accreditation. It does not have a PPA for sale at preferential tariff; and</p>
<p>It sells the electricity generated to distribution licensee of the area at a price not exceeding the pooled cost of power, or</p>
<p>To any other licensee / OA consumer at a mutually agreed price, or</p>
<p>Through a power exchange at market determined price</p>
<p><strong>How can the Obligated and Eligible Entities participate in REC mechanism?</strong></p>
<p>Eligible entities would have to undergo the following process to participate in the REC mechanism:</p>
<p>Accreditation with state agency</p>
<p>Registration with central agency</p>
<p>Obligated entities would have to register with the central agency in order to participate in the REC mechanism</p>
<p><strong>Who are the other entities involved in the REC mechanism?</strong></p>
<p>The following entities would be involved in national and state level for the REC mechanism</p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="88%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="51%">National/ Central Level Institutions</td>
<td width="48%">State Level Institutions</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="51%">Forum of Regulators</td>
<td width="48%">State Electricity Regulatory Commission</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="51%">Central Electricity Regulatory Commission</td>
<td width="48%">State load despatch centres</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="51%">Power exchange(s)</td>
<td width="48%">State agencies</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="51%">Central agency (NLDC)</td>
<td width="48%">Eligible entities</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td width="51%">Compliance auditors</td>
<td width="48%">Obligated entities</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<p><strong><em>Power Exchange India Limited</em></strong></p>
<p>CERC has mandated that only power exchanges approved by CERC can trade in RECs. The salient features of trading REC through exchanges are as below:</p>
<p>Only a registered member or client of the exchange can trade RECs.</p>
<p>Trading would happen once in a month on the last Wednesday of each month.</p>
<p>Trading of two categories of RECs viz., solar and non-solar, would be undertaken on the power exchanges.</p>
<p>Each category of REC would have maximum (forbearance) and minimum (floor) price prescribed by CERC.</p>
<p>Exchanges will match trades subject to the number of RECs being bid for sale being confirmed by the central agency.</p>
<p>All those certificates that get matched would be extinguished by the central agency.</p>
<p> <strong><em>Power Exchange India Limited</em></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energybusiness.in/4407/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wind energy to surge by 2030, but grid constrains</title>
		<link>http://energybusiness.in/wind-energy-surge-2030-grid-constrains/</link>
		<comments>http://energybusiness.in/wind-energy-surge-2030-grid-constrains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gayatrir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebexclusive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gamesa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GE siemens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenpeace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GWEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sinovel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vestas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world wind energy capacity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energybusiness.in/?p=4386</guid>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://img.energybusiness.in/r1.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-4387" title="r" src="http://img.energybusiness.in/r1-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>Wind energy will increase to generate between 5 and 22 per cent of world power by 2030 and countries need to do more to expand electricity grids to cope, a study by pro-wind groups showed.</p>
<p>The report, by the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC) and environmental group Greenpeace, also said nations in Latin America and Africa were shifting to wind alongside established markets in Europe, North America, China and India.</p>
<p>It said wind turbines accounted for about 2.3 per cent of world electricity demand in 2010. Growth in China had outpaced previous projections by GWEC and Greenpeace but the United States had lagged, partly because of the economic downturn.</p>
<p>“We are still very optimistic, but grid issues are becoming more and more important for the wind industry,” Sven Teske, senior energy expert at Greenpeace said. Grid capacity was lacking in many nations.<br />
The study said wind would rise to 5 per cent of world electricity demand by 2030, or 1,400 terawatt hours (Tw/h), assuming 2009 reference scenarios by the International Energy Agency, which foresees a slowdown in wind growth in coming years.<br />
In the most positive investment scenario, GWEC and Greenpeace said wind could generate up to 22 per cent of global power by 2030, or 5,400 Tw/h, if the world took strong action to promote renewables.<br />
GWEC&#8217;s corporate members include Vestas, Siemens, GE Energy, Gamesa and Sinovel.<br />
The report said there were big uncertainties about the future of stalled UN talks on a new treaty to slow global warming that would promote investments in renewables in a shift from fossil fuels.<br />
Teske said that the wind industry was erecting one new wind turbine every 30 minutes, with one in three in China. He said Greenpeace and GWEC wanted a new turbine every 7 minutes to reach the highest goal.<br />
He said Germany was likely to be among the first nations to face problems of grid capacity with new offshore wind turbines coming on stream. He said the country lacked power transmission lines to take electricity south from the coast.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s not a limiting factor now but it could be within the next five years or so,&#8221; he said.<br />
The report also said that China was among nations that needed to do more.<br />
&#8220;In China &#8230; the grid infrastructure is proving to be a serious issue, especially in areas with high wind speeds, such as the Northwest, the North and the Northeast,&#8221; it said.<br />
Teske said that wind was getting more investments in some developing nations. &#8220;We see that there is movement both in Latin America and in Africa, in some every unexpected places like Kenya, Egypt or Eritrea,&#8221; he said. &#8211; Agencies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energybusiness.in/wind-energy-surge-2030-grid-constrains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tianjin climate talks deliver little</title>
		<link>http://energybusiness.in/tianjin-climate-talks-deliver-little/</link>
		<comments>http://energybusiness.in/tianjin-climate-talks-deliver-little/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gayatrir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancun climate talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tianjin climate talks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNFCCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energybusiness.in/?p=4360</guid>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest round of international global warming negotiations wrapped up late Saturday night in Tianjin, China with little meaningful progress having taken place. The talks were seen as a stocktaking exercise before the 2010 UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Conference of the Parties (COP), which will get underway at the end of November in Cancun, Mexico.</p>
<p>Two major elements of the Copenhagen Accord &#8211; which emerged from last year’s COP in Copenhagen &#8211; have been in the spotlight of the climate negotiations throughout 2010 and in Tianjin: climate finance and the procedures that will be used to check whether countries fulfill their obligations with regards to cutting greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
<p>In the Copenhagen Accord, developed countries promised to make US $30 billion of “fast start” financing available from 2010 to 2012 to support developing countries’ plans to mitigate and adapt to climate change. By 2020, the amount of climate finance should reach US $100 billion annually. Besides concerns over whether these funds would be additional to existing Official Development Assistance (ODA), it has been difficult to agree on the mechanism through which the money should be distributed.</p>
<p><strong>Climate fund begins to take shape</strong></p>
<p>In Tianjin, the contours of a global climate fund were discussed.  Current options include establishing some form of a financial board and advisory panel that would then also put the architecture in place. The United States proposed to gather finance ministers and have them work on the details.</p>
<p>In turn, developing countries &#8211; and especially the largest among them &#8211; promised in Copenhagen that their efforts to cut greenhouse gas emissions will be subject to measurement, reporting and verification (MRV). In other words, developing countries will put a set of processes and procedures in place through which factual information is provided, assessed and checked to determine whether, when, and how effectively they are able meet their climate change mitigation obligations. The BASIC countries (Brazil, South Africa, India and China) meanwhile are reluctant to provide the level of information that is being demanded of them.</p>
<p>This balance between funding from developed countries and accountability from developing countries was at the heart of the climate negotiations last week in Tianjin. But by the end of the week, countries seemed further apart though on these and other issues than they were in Copenhagen. The high global expectations or political pressure that was palpable before Copenhagen seems to have eased off. Even the UNFCCC Executive Secretary, Christiana Figueres, had to admit that “Mexico will not deliver a comprehensive agreement on climate change this year.” Instead, hopes are turned to the South Africa COP, which will take place at the end of 2011.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energybusiness.in/tianjin-climate-talks-deliver-little/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Draft Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission multi year tariff</title>
		<link>http://energybusiness.in/draft-maharashtra-electricity-regulatory-commission-multi-year/</link>
		<comments>http://energybusiness.in/draft-maharashtra-electricity-regulatory-commission-multi-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>makarandg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[merc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energybusiness.in/?p=3852</guid>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Multi Year Tariff (MYT) regulations are performance based regulations, with due reward being given for operational efficiency and replace the present method of annual tariff determination with a multi-year tariff framework, wherein the tariffs will be allowed to change only due to change in the values of selected parameters in a pre-determined manner.</p>
<p>Background<br />
The Electricity Act, 2003 (EA 2003) requires that while specifying the Terms and Conditions for determination of tariff the State Electricity Regulatory Commissions should be guided by Multi-Year Tariff (MYT) principles. Subsequent to the notification of the present MERC Tariff Regulations, 2005 certain developments have taken place, viz., CERC Tariff Regulations for the Control Period from April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2014 have been notified, and the National Electricity Policy and the Tariff Policy have been notified by the Ministry of Power, Government of India, which provide the guidelines for determination of the Revenue Requirement and tariff. The MERC also desired to incorporate the learnings of the first Control Period in the revised MYT Regulations. Hence, MERC decided to formulate the MERC MYT Regulations.</p>
<p>Salient Features<br />
The MYT Regulations are Performance Based Regulations, with due reward being given to operational efficiency, and replace the present method of annual tariff determination with a multi-year tariff framework, wherein the tariffs will be allowed to change only due to change in the values of selected parameters in a pre-determined manner. One of the major problems faced by the Utility Companies, is the lack of long-term planning discipline. The MYT Regulations require the submission of a 5-year Business Plan, which will inter-alia require the Utilities to project the demand-supply scenario, the power procurement plan, and capital investments required to achieve the desired operational efficiency and meet load growth requirements over the 5-year period, rather than operating with a short-term outlook. The next Control Period of five years will commence on April 1, 2011 and continue upto March 31, 2016.<br />
Unless the distribution licensees enter into long-term or medium-term contracts at optimum rates for the required quantum of power, there will always be a trade-off between shedding load or procuring costly power to mitigate the load shedding, which will result in higher tariffs. The objective of having a long-term plan is to ensure that load shedding is avoided to the extent practicable, and the distribution licensees ensure that adequate capacity is contracted under long-term/medium-term/short-term contracts as appropriate at optimum prices, to ensure that the consumers are supplied electricity on 24 x 7 basis, and the tariffs are also reasonable. The Investment Plan shall be a least cost plan for undertaking investments for strengthening and augmentation of the operations of the Utility, as applicable for Generation Companies, Transmission Licensees, and Distribution Licensees.<br />
Under the MYT framework, the controllable factors and uncontrollable factors and their treatment has been stipulated. The impact of uncontrollable factors are a pass-through element in tariffs, while the impact – gain or loss – on account of controllable factors, has to be shared between the Utility and the consumers in a specified manner.<br />
The MYT framework is based on the following elements, for calculation of Aggregate Revenue Requirement (ARR):<br />
(i) Submission of a detailed Business Plan;<br />
(ii) Submission of the forecast of ARR and expected revenue from existing tariffs and charges, based on the approved Business Plan, along with indexed parameters for each year of the Control Period;<br />
(iii) The trajectory for specific variables shall be stipulated by the Commission, where the performance of the Applicant is sought to be improved through incentives and disincentives;<br />
(iv) Mid-term review of performance vis-à-vis the approved forecast and categorization of performance variations as controllable factors and uncontrollable factors, shall be undertaken by MERC;<br />
(v) The mechanism for pass-through of approved gains or losses on account of uncontrollable factors as specified by MERC;<br />
(vi) The mechanism for sharing of approved gains or losses arising out of controllable factors as specified by the Commission.<br />
(vii) Tariff will be determined for the entire Control Period at the beginning of the Control Period.<br />
(viii) The gain or loss to the Generating Company/Licensee on account of uncontrollable factors shall be passed through as an adjustment in the tariff of the Generating Company/Licensee on a half yearly basis through the ‘Z’ factor.</p>
<p>The MYT Regulations have also addressed the operational norms and financial principles for the Generation, Transmission, Wires and Supply Business, including the method of giving returns (Return on Equity vs. Return on Capital Employed), separation of accounts of Wires and Supply Business, to facilitate Open Access and increase the level of competition, which in turn, will result in improved quality of supply and reduction in tariffs, as well as the distribution loss reduction trajectory, power procurement guidelines, etc.<br />
Benefits to Consumers &amp; Utility Companies<br />
The MYT framework is designed to:<br />
 Provide regulatory certainty to the Utilities, investors and consumers by promoting transparency, consistency and predictability of regulatory approach, thereby minimizing the perception of regulatory risk.<br />
 Address the risk sharing mechanism between Utilities and consumers based on controllable and uncontrollable factors.<br />
 Ensure financial viability of the sector to attract investment, ensure growth and safeguard the interest of the consumers.<br />
 Review operational norms for Generation, Transmission, Distribution and Supply businesses, based on recent developments and actual performance in the first Control Period.<br />
 Promote operational efficiency.<br />
 Reduce tariffs in the long-term.</p>
<p>The copy of the detailed Approach Paper and the draft MERC (MYT) Regulations, 2010, have been uploaded on the Commission&#8217;s website, viz., <a href="http://www.mercindia.org.in/">www.mercindia.org.in</a>, for public comments. Interested stakeholders may submit their comments and suggestions in writing to MERC, within</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energybusiness.in/draft-maharashtra-electricity-regulatory-commission-multi-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Encouraging Policies for Renewables</title>
		<link>http://energybusiness.in/encouraging-policies-renewables/</link>
		<comments>http://energybusiness.in/encouraging-policies-renewables/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>renjiniv</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Reports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energybusiness.in/?p=3660</guid>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://img.energybusiness.in/arko-II.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-3661" title="arko II" src="http://img.energybusiness.in/arko-II-150x150.jpg" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a>It is becoming increasingly important to channelize the energy resources in the right direction to optimize the efficiency in a cost effective manner. At this point, exploring alternative sources of energy like renewable energy appears dependable. The Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE) plays an important role in the development of renewable energy.</p>
<p>The Energy Conservation Act, 1991 provides the legal framework, institutional arrangement and a regulatory mechanism at the central and state level to embark upon an energy efficiency drive in the country. The energy conservation act empowers the BEE to appoint energy auditors and energy managers to assist consumers, designated agencies to achieve efficient use of energy by means of energy cost optimization, pollution control, safety aspects, suggests the methods to improve the operating and maintenance practices of equipments etc.</p>
<p>The term renewable energy or non conventional energy includes energy from solar, biomass, fuel wood, crop residue, dung, biogas, wood gasifier, wind, wave, tidal and hydro. The attempt here is to explain the renewable energy initiative from a legal perspective as well as the fiscal incentives or subsidies available and the scope for foreign investments.</p>
<p><strong>Central policies<br />
</strong>Under the Electricity Act 2003, the state electricity regulatory commissions have been empowered inter-alia to promote cogeneration and generation of electricity from renewables. One of the principal issues that the national electricity policy 2005 seeks to address is co-generation from non-conventional sources. The emphasis is on research, development and commercialization of non-conventional energy. The Policy further states that non-conventional sources of energy could be used for purposes of rural electrification.</p>
<p>Prior to the formulation of the 11th five year plan, the Planning Commission had formed an expert committee to look into various issues relating to energy. Pursuant thereto, the committee headed by Dr Kirit S Parekh had prepared a report titled ‘The Integrated Energy Policy’ in 2006.</p>
<p><strong>The policy recommendations:</strong></p>
<p>• Village Panchayats to decide on the renewable energy source to electrify villages<br />
• Publication of an annual renewable energy report on performance of different renewable technologies at state and national levels<br />
• Setting up of venture capital funds to finance entrepreneurs in the energy sector<br />
• Carving out commission for additional sources of energy (CASE) from the ministry of non-conventional energy and making it responsible for overall development of renewable energy programmes<br />
• Convert Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency (IREDA) into a refinancing institution.<br />
<br />
<strong>State policies</strong><br />
Several state regulatory electricity commissions such as Gujarat, Kerala, Tamil Nadu have formulated policies on utilization of renewable sources. For example, Gujarat state’s power procurement from renewable sources regulations 2005, Kerala state’s power procurement from renewable sources by distribution licensee regulations 2006, The power procurement from new and renewable sources of energy regulations 2008. The said regulations primarily deal with sale of power from renewable sources and determination of tariff.</p>
<p><strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energybusiness.in/encouraging-policies-renewables/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ambani Brothers’ Battle Round 2: Heading for the Markets</title>
		<link>http://energybusiness.in/ambani-brothers-battle-round-2-heading-markets/</link>
		<comments>http://energybusiness.in/ambani-brothers-battle-round-2-heading-markets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gayatrir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upstream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anil ambani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas price dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kg Gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mukesh ambani]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RIL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNRL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energybusiness.in/?p=2842</guid>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Renjini Liza Varghese</p>
<p>When the most bitterly fought battle in Indian corporate history was set to rest by Supreme Court and given a clear directive to settle all disputes, everyone was keen to see what agreement the Ambani brothers arrive at.  Typically, on a lazy Sunday morning, Mukesh Ambani’s Reliance Industries issued a bland statement announcing the end of the non-compete agreement signed between him and younger brother Anil.</p>
<p>As news of the truce started to sink in, the next question that crossed everyone’s mind was who played the pivotal role in bringing in the warring brothers to the table? Was it Kokilaben, their mother, or did the first step come from the elder brother as has been reported widely.</p>
<p>But a majority of Mukesh’s close friends believe that petroleum minister Murli Deora, an old family friend, was instrumental in bringing about the truce. They don’t rule out the possibility of Anil losing political support after Amar Singh expulsion from the Samajwadi Party. And some are of the opinion that Nita Ambani, Mukesh’s wife may also have played a crucial role in the new agreement.</p>
<p>For the record this is a step towards reconciliation, and the RIL statement said as much: “RIL and Anil Ambani-led ADAG have approved and signed an agreement canceling all existing non-compete arrangements entered into between the two groups in January 2006 pursuant to the scheme of reorganisation of the Reliance Group and entered into a new simpler, non compete agreement with respect to only gas based power generation.</p>
<p>The above agreements have been approved by the board of directors of RIL and the respective ADAG. The cancellation of the existing non-compete agreement as above will provide enhanced operational and financial flexibility to both groups, and greater ability to participate in high growth sectors of the Indian economy, such as oil and gas, petrochemicals, telecommunications, power, and financial services. However, RIL has agreed not to enter into gas based power generation business for the period up to March 31, 2022.”</p>
<p>The prospect of the two brothers working together again, however loosely, had the corporate world sitting up and taking note. A source close to the family who has watched both brothers growing up felt that how the new opportunities that have opened up with new no-compete are harnessed by either group will be a reflection of the brothers’ individual temperaments and working styles. </p>
<p>“While Mukesh’s moves are well thought-out and timed, Anil is much more impromptu in his decision making. It will not come as a surprise if RIL enters businesses that Anil has a strong presence in the medium term. Telecom for instance, was Mukesh’s baby from the very beginning,” said the source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energybusiness.in/ambani-brothers-battle-round-2-heading-markets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oil market outlook uncertain, says IEA</title>
		<link>http://energybusiness.in/oil-market-outlook-uncertain-iea/</link>
		<comments>http://energybusiness.in/oil-market-outlook-uncertain-iea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 10:00:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gayatrir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Upstream]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LNG supplies 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mid term oil and gas review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Noburu Tanaka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tanaka]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energybusiness.in/?p=2837</guid>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://img.energybusiness.in/tanaka1.jpg"></a>  Highlights</p>
<ul>
<li>Strong growth in China, India &amp; Middle East</li>
<li>Flat demand in EU</li>
<li>Oil supplies could tighten without improved efficiency and diversified transport fuels</li>
<li>In natural gas, demand modelling for the OECD region indicates a return to 2008 demand levels by 2012</li>
<li>China is seen as an area of strong growth for natural gas, with demand doubling to 140 bcm by 2015</li>
<li>The rise of non-conventional gas and LNG bring a wave of new gas supplies</li>
<li>Factors that could impact future supplies include the continuing depletion of existing oil and gas production, geopolitical risks in producing countries such as Nigeria, Russia and Iraq, and potential deepwater project delays after the recent Gulf of Mexico disaster</li>
</ul>
<p>EB Bureau</p>
<p>“Oil and gas markets are starting to show signs of recovery, but the impact of the recession differs across regions, and the outlook remains very uncertain,” said Nobuo Tanaka, executive director of the International Energy Agency (IEA), while launching the Medium Term Oil and Gas Markets 2010. He said, “In both oil and gas, we see a notable dichotomy between non-OECD and OECD markets, with strong growth in China, India and the Middle East compared to weaker or flat demand elsewhere, especially in the fragile European economy. These contrasting trends cloud efforts to foresee how oil and gas markets will develop into the medium term. But what is clear is that both will need more investment, a greater focus on energy efficiency and improved data,” Tanaka said.</p>
<p>Taking into account this uncertainty, the IEA report presents two oil demand cases for the next five years: one based on relatively strong GDP growth of nearly 4.5 per cent per year from 2010 onwards (in line with the most recent IMF projections) and a reduction in oil use intensity of 3 per cent annually; the other one based on lower GDP growth at 3 per cent but with correspondingly slower reductions in oil intensity. Under higher growth, even with ongoing energy efficiency improvements, oil demand increases by an average of +1.2 million barrels per day (mb/d) annually (1.4 per cent), reaching close to 92 mb/d by 2015. Oil demand recovers to pre-crisis 2007 levels again by 2010. Effective OPEC spare capacity in this scenario begins to decline again as soon as next year, reaching 3.6 mb/d by 2015. While new OPEC capacity should come on stream in 2014, we anticipate a tightening global balance, with surplus capacity falling below 5per cent of global demand. This could lead to more jittery markets ahead, after what has been a prolonged period of relative price stability over the past year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energybusiness.in/oil-market-outlook-uncertain-iea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Middle East seeks green energy</title>
		<link>http://energybusiness.in/middle-east-seeks-green-energy/</link>
		<comments>http://energybusiness.in/middle-east-seeks-green-energy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 09:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gayatrir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abengao]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cevital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[middle east energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shams1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar PV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USTDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energybusiness.in/?p=2642</guid>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://img.energybusiness.in/solar-panels2.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-2663" title="solar panels" src="http://img.energybusiness.in/solar-panels2.jpg" alt="" width="140" height="103" /></a>Jordan imports 97  per cent of its energy needs from neighbouring countries, but lies in the so-called sun-belt area and possesses a high potential for solar power. The annual daily average solar irradiation on a horizontal surface ranges between 5 and 7 kilowatt-hours (kWh) per square meter, one of the highest in the world. Photovoltaic solar systems have been operating in Jordan for some time, as decentralized systems in the rural and remote villages provide electricity for lighting, water-pumping and other social services.</p>
<p>The US Trade and Development Agency (USTDA) extended a grant to help fund the feasibility study for Jordan&#8217;s first major private solar-power project on the sidelines of the MENA Power 2010 forum in Cairo. According to a statement from Kawar Energy, the estimated cost of the project is US $400 million, and the USTDA grant will be used to assist to implement the plan, evaluate technology and assess equipment.</p>
<p>While Algeria has proven natural gas reserves of 4.5 trillion cubic meters, the country also has a high potential of solar energy. Annual solar irradiation is about 1,700 kWh per square meter for the northern part of the country and 2,263 kWh per square meter in the south of the country.</p>
<p>In May 2010, Cevital, Algeria&#8217;s largest private company, began seeking foreign investors to help it build an US $8 billion solar power complex to export electricity to Europe.<br />
Although the United Arab Emirates has been a member of OPEC since 1967 and has proven natural gas reserves of more than 6 billion cubic meters, proven crude reserves of 97.8 billion barrels, it is also implementing various solar power projects.</p>
<p>This month Abu Dhabi Future Energy Company unveiled the Shams 1 project, which is being developed in collaboration with Total SA of France and Abengoa Solar of Spain. The project will contribute 7 per cent of the energy needs of Abu Dhabi from renewable energy by 2020.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energybusiness.in/middle-east-seeks-green-energy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civil nuclear liability bill: hoping for a safe Passage</title>
		<link>http://energybusiness.in/civil-nuclear-liability-bill-hoping-safe-passage/</link>
		<comments>http://energybusiness.in/civil-nuclear-liability-bill-hoping-safe-passage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 10:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gayatrir</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[123 agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atomic energy act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil nuclear liability bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DAE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indo-US nuclear agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear accidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paris convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prithviraj Chavan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vienna convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yashwant sinha]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://energybusiness.in/?p=2227</guid>
					<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the government may have no option but to reconcile itself to amending the Civil Nuclear Liability Bill, and accept some of the opposition parties’ suggestions, especially on the liability amount. Otherwise, the bill looks unlikely to get the lawmakers’ consent. The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government is on the back foot in the Lok Sabha after the loss of outside support from Samajwadi Party and Rashtriya Janta Dal and is in no position to face the combined strength of the BJP and the Left parties on the issue and chose to drop its plan to introduce the bill in the first half of the budget session.</p>
<p>The current draft provides for a cap of US $300 million special drawing rights (SDR) or around Rs 2108 crore on total compensation and limits the liability of the plant operator to Rs 500 crore.</p>
<p>The opposition parties’ major objection to the bill in its present format is the maximum limit for compensation which they claim is too low. “In the case of a nuclear accident, the bill allows the supplier to get away without paying a dime, even if it is established that the accident was caused by defective supply. The bill protects the interests of American companies, as neither the Russians nor the French who have agreed to supply nuclear reactors to India have asked for the passage of the bill,” said the Brinda Karat, Rajya Sabha MP and CPI (M) politbureau member. American law explicitly forbids the supply of equipment to any country which doesn’t have a law to limit liability in case of a nuclear accident.</p>
<p>Minister of state in the Prime Minister’s Office, Prithviraj Chavan, countered these arguments saying, “The government has an open mind on the issue. Parliament can pass a law raising the cap. But we have to remember, higher the cap higher cost of getting insurance and generating power. We examined caps all over world and came up with figure of Rs 500 crore.  China has cap of Rs 200 crore. Very few countries like Japan, Germany, and South Korea put no cap but if we keep no cap, no one will invest in India.”</p>
<p>Chavan also refuted charges that that government is opening the sector to private investors including foreign ones through the backdoor. “The nuclear core and part of the pressurised chamber and heat generating rods will be supplied by foreign companies.  However, the dome which houses the core, the concrete work, brickwork, cladding, etc. will be by our own companies.”</p>
<p>Internationally, there are three major conventions on liabilities in the case of a nuclear accident – the Convention on Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damages (CSC), and the Vienna and Paris conventions. These conventions are based on seven principles of law – a) no fault liability, b) liability limited in amount, c) liability limited in time, d)  channelling of liability to the installation operator, e) a single competent court to adjudicate claims, f) compulsory financial security, g) no discriminatory treatment (based on nationality, domicile or residence).</p>
<p>Currently India is not a signatory to any of these conventions but has indicated that it might join the CSC to which the US is also a party. Under CSC the operator is liable for nuclear damages up to specified amount with a two-tier compensation system. The country where nuclear plant is installed has to ensure the availability of at least US $300 million SDRs and the second tier of compensation can come from contributions made by contracting parties and limits the period for compensation claim to 10 years.</p>
<p>A retired bureaucrat with a long stint at the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) observed that apart from bringing Indian laws on par with various international conventions on atomic accident liability, the present bill also aims to open up the sector for private investment 10-15 years down the line. “Private investment will come only if an investor knows what will be his liability in case of an accident,” he said. “This is a quid pro quo that we have to accept to end our nuclear isolation,” he added.</p>
<p> Former finance minister and senior BJP leader Yashwant Sinha said, “The bill in its present form is not acceptable at all. We want the government to scrap the present legislation completely and bring in a new one which takes care of our concerns like setting higher limits for compensation, blocking the backdoor entry of FDI into the sector and not allowing suppliers to get away with blue murder.” Elaborating on his argument Sinha said, “We suspect government wants open backdoor for foreign direct investment (FDI) in the field of nuclear power by way of this bill; otherwise there is no need for liability bill. The Atomic Energy Act 1962, clearly states that all the nuclear plants in the country will be run by the government or government-owned entities.  If the government has no intention to amend this position then why have this bill? For last 50-odd years since India built its first nuclear reactor, the present regime has worked for us perfectly, so why can it not work in the future also? And if the unfortunate eventuality of a nuclear accident takes place, and then since the government owns the nuclear reactors, its liability is absolute, so there is no need for liability law.”</p>
<p>Sinha pointed out that the US law on civil nuclear liability, the Price-Anderson Act, sets a minimum liability of US $10 billion and puts no cap on the maximum and the courts are free to decide on damages beyond this amount. However, our bill puts a maximum limit of Rs 2133 crore which is absolute peanuts. One is forced to draw the conclusion that the life of a US citizen is 23 times more valuable compared to an Indian.”</p>
<p>Former power minister Suresh Prabhu said, “The present liability limit is too low and it must be substantially increased. Considering that the governments are always constrained for resources, the amount which it proposes as compensation for accidents beyond what is the liability of the operator should be kept in a separate fund and managed through this fund. Besides, the limit of one year for filing compensation after the accident is too low, considering that it can take years before one comes to know the health problems associated with radiation.”</p>
<p>With the government being eager to sign the spent fuel deal with the US during president Barack Obama’s India visit in the later half of the year, and the opposition having the numbers to make its stand stick in the Lok Sabha, it seems that the government has no choice but to redraft the bill to ensure the safe passage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://energybusiness.in/civil-nuclear-liability-bill-hoping-safe-passage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

